Supreme Court Opens the Door to Greater Accountability in Trucking Cases: What Wisconsin Drivers Need to Know
Commercial trucks move goods across Wisconsin every day. From Milwaukee-area freeways to state highways serving communities throughout Southeastern Wisconsin, tractor-trailers and freight carriers are a major part of our economy. But when safety standards are ignored, the consequences can be catastrophic.
A major decision from the Supreme Court of the United States issued on May 14, 2026, may significantly change trucking injury litigation nationwide including here in Wisconsin. The ruling creates greater accountability within the freight industry and may expand legal options for individuals injured in serious truck crashes.
What the Supreme Court Decided in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport
Case Summary
Case:
Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC (No. 24-1238)
Decision Date: May 14, 2026
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that negligent hiring claims against freight brokers are not automatically blocked by federal law.
The case centered around the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA), a federal statute often used by freight brokers to argue they could not be held responsible for selecting unsafe trucking companies.
The Court disagreed.
In a 9–0 unanimous decision, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that states retain authority to enforce safety-related laws involving motor vehicles. That includes requiring freight brokers to exercise ordinary care when choosing which trucking companies operate on public roads.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, issued a concurring opinion emphasizing the public safety implications:
"Truck safety is a matter of life and death. … If brokers can be held liable for disregarding poor safety records, they have a strong incentive to do business only with safe and reliable motor carriers."
The Facts Behind the Case
The plaintiff, Shawn Montgomery, suffered devastating injuries in 2017 after a commercial truck operated by Caribe Transport struck his vehicle.
The truck had been dispatched through freight broker C.H. Robinson.
Court records indicated concerns involving the carrier’s safety history, including:
- A conditional safety rating
- Prior careless driving citations involving the driver
Mr. Montgomery lost his leg as a result of the crash.
Lower federal courts previously ruled in favor of the freight broker, concluding federal law shielded brokers from negligent hiring claims.
The Supreme Court reversed that outcome.
The case now returns to lower courts for trial.
More importantly, the ruling resolves disagreements among federal appellate courts and applies nationwide in all 50 states.
The Legal Reasoning.
Legal opinions can sometimes read like another language. Here is what happened in straightforward terms.
Congress passed the FAAAA in 1994 to prevent states from creating regulations that interfere with trucking prices, routes, and transportation services.
Freight brokers argued that negligent hiring lawsuits interfere with their services and therefore should be blocked by federal law.
The Supreme Court disagreed because Congress included an important exception.
States still maintain authority over motor vehicle safety regulations.
Justice Barrett's opinion focused on one central question:
Does requiring a freight broker to use reasonable care when selecting a trucking company directly concern motor vehicle safety?
The Court said yes.
If a freight broker places unsafe trucks and unsafe carriers on Wisconsin roads, that decision directly impacts public safety.
The Court also relied on prior Supreme Court precedent that interpreted the phrase "with respect to motor vehicles" broadly to mean matters that "concern" motor vehicles and roadway safety.
The freight industry presented several arguments opposing that interpretation.
The Court rejected each one.
Freight industry advocates argued this interpretation would effectively eliminate federal protections for brokers.
The Court responded that only safety-related claims survive federal preemption. Claims involving pricing structures, routes, or transportation services remain federally protected.
Industry groups also argued Congress could not have intended differing treatment among separate transportation statutes.
Justice Barrett delivered what may become one of the most frequently quoted lines in trucking litigation:
"Better to live with the mystery than to rewrite the statute."
Why This Matters for Wisconsin Injury Victims
Truck accident litigation is rarely simple.
Multiple parties may potentially share responsibility:
- Truck drivers
- Trucking companies
- Freight brokers
- Cargo companies
- Maintenance contractors
- Vehicle owners
- Dispatch operations
For injured victims and families, identifying every potentially responsible party can significantly affect financial recovery.
Compensation in serious trucking injury cases may involve:
- Medical expenses
- Lost wages
- Future medical treatment
- Rehabilitation costs
- Pain and suffering
- Permanent disability damages
- Wrongful death claims
This Supreme Court ruling may create additional legal avenues for accountability when freight brokers place unsafe carriers on Wisconsin roads.
Trucking Cases Require Fast Action
Commercial trucking companies often possess critical evidence that must be preserved quickly.
That evidence can include:
- Electronic logging data
- Driver qualification files
- Safety histories
- Maintenance records
- Carrier selection documentation
- Internal dispatch communications
- Inspection reports
Waiting too long can make obtaining key evidence more difficult.
If you or a family member has been injured in a trucking accident, obtaining legal guidance early may help protect your rights.
Free Consultation With Attorney Steve Kmiec
If you have questions involving a trucking accident, serious injury case, or potential liability involving commercial transportation companies, I invite you to contact my office.
We offer free consultations and flexible meeting options.
Milwaukee Office
Attorney Steve Kmiec
3741 W. National Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53215
Phone: (414) 649-9790
Mukwonago Office
Attorney Steve Kmiec
221 N. Rochester Street
Mukwonago, WI 53149
Phone: (262) 650-6800
Two Wisconsin Locations
In-Person Meetings Available
Zoom Consultations Available
Phone Consultations Available
Call today to discuss your situation and understand your legal options.





